MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An optimization model for detailed scheduling of heterogeneous fleet of log trucks considering synchronization

2023· article· en· W6977056894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicForest Biomass Utilization and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckScheduling (production processes)OvertimeScheduleInteger programmingLinear programmingJob shop schedulingFleet management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Log transportation accounts for a significant portion of the total delivered cost of logs due to the considerable number of truckloads between origins and destinations. Hence, an efficient transportation plan at the operational level can generate cost savings for forest companies. In this paper, a mixed integer linear programming model is developed for daily routing and scheduling of heterogeneous trucks considering synchronization constraints. Continuous time representation is used for modeling the problem to generate accurate schedules and to synchronize the trucks and loaders at cut blocks and sort yards. Compatibility requirements, overtime, and decisions related to the trucking contractors are incorporated in the model. The outputs of the model include the number of trucks utilized by each contractor, the arrival times and waiting times of trucks at each location, the detailed schedule of loaders, and the amount of overtime assigned to the drivers. To validate the model, it is applied to test problems from a case of a Canadian forest company, where transportation activities are contracted out. Results show it is more economical to pay overtime than dispatching additional trucks to carry logs. Additionally, variable costs and maximum driving time have the most impact on the total transportation cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementFrench-language works237,207