Script and data for major revision of "Agronomic non-native species are overrepresented across habitat types in central Canada" by Murillo et al.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The project contains R scripts and data for the revised version of the manuscript by Murillo et al., "Agronomic non-native species are overrepresented across habitat types in central Canada". 1. R code of analysis for the main manuscript:agronomic_species_ms_script_revised.R2. Datasets used in the R script file:adjusted_values_all_final3.csvDataset with the richness values adjusted to account for differences in plot sizes across habitat types. Addition of GPS coordinates for each surveyed plot. Details of the sampling procedure can be found in the main manuscript.species_data_all_habitats_functional_trait.csvVegetation survey data with the full species-plot observations, including the foliar cover of each species.species.cover.aliens.only.csvDataset of all non-native species from the vegetation survey, the total cover of each species, and the assigned usage category. For details on usage category, refer to the main manuscript.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.316 | 0.148 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".