MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multispectral intraoperative imaging for the detection of the hemodynamic response to interictal epileptiform discharges

2022· other· en· W6977236998 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageHaemodynamic responseIctalHemodynamicsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingElectrocorticographyMagnetic resonance imagingFunctional imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are brief neuronal discharges occurring between seizures in patients with epilepsy. The characterization of the hemodynamic response function (HRF) specific to IEDs could increase the accuracy of other functional imaging techniques to localize epileptiform activity, including functional near-infrared spectroscopy and functional magnetic resonance imaging. This study evaluated the possibility of using an intraoperative multispectral imaging system combined with electrocorticography (ECoG) to measure the average HRF associated with IEDs in eight patients. Inter-patient variability of the HRF is illustrated in terms of oxygenated hemoglobin peak latency, oxygenated hemoglobin increase/decrease following IEDs, and signal-to-noise ratio. A sub-region was identified using an unsupervised clustering algorithm in three patients that corresponded to the most active area identified by ECoG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207