Additional file 1 of Sex differences in mitochondrial gene expression during viral myocarditis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supplementary Material 1: Additional File 1: Figure S1. Other pathways/genesets from F-MYO vs M-MYO Enrichment Mapping. Figure S2. Row normalized heatmaps from GSEA analysis comparing mitochondrial pathways for F-MYO vs M-MYO. Figure S3. Enrichment mapping results from Metascape for F-CON comparing F-CON vs F-MYO. Figure S4. Enrichment mapping results from Metascape for F-MYO comparing F-CON vs F-MYO. NMD = nonsense mediated decay, EJC = exon junction complex. Figure S5. Enrichment mapping results from Metascape for M-CON comparing M-CON vs M-MYO. Figure S6. Enrichment mapping results from Metascape for M-MYO comparing M-CON vs M-MYO. Figure S7. Verification of mitochondrial fraction purity. Figure S8. Background respiration in the presence of antimycin A measured by Clark electrode. Figure S9. Females with myocarditis express higher levels of mitochondrial master regulators PGC1α and NRF1. Table S1. gProfiler enrichment results comparing males and females with myocarditis Table S2. Published sex differences in cardiac mitochondrial properties
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.829 | 0.172 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".