Fig. S5a, b, c. Reconstructing the Variscan basement under the West Iberian Margin and the Newfoundland conjugate margin: exploring the role of tectonic inheritance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fig. 5: 2.5D gravity models, seismic reflection data, and structural interpretation along the WIM: (a) Profile A, (b) Profile B, (c) Profile C (Amigo Marx et al. 2022), (d) Profile 1 (modified from Pérez-Gussinyé et al. 2003, (e) Profile 2, (f) Profile 3, (g) Profile 4, (h) Profile 5 (modified from Afilhado et al. 2008). For each profile, the Free Air anomaly, the Bouguer anomaly (with a 2.2 g/cm3 correction), and the total horizontal derivative of the 20 km upward continued anomaly (THD UC Bouguer) are shown. Modelling was performed using the Free-Air anomaly. The crustal thickness for each profile is shown below it, with a colour bar where blue represents thickness in the proximal domain, green to yellow represents the thickness of the strongly rifted domain, red represents the thickness in the hyperextended domain, and black represents domains of exhumed sub-continental mantle (without continental crust). Below the crustal thickness, the amount of extension is indicated using the Beta (β) factor (stretching factor) for each profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.299 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".