MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977349279 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.808.v1

Cluster analysis of publicly available sequences

2011· other· en· W6977349279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMorphological variations and asymmetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster (spacecraft)Set (abstract data type)Data setField (mathematics)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copyright information:Taken from "Genomics and embryology in amphibians"Genome Biology 2000;1(5):reports4022.1-reports4022.3.Published online 8 Nov 2000PMCID:PMC138882.Copyright © 2000 GenomeBiology.com Sequences deposited in public databases up to June 2000 (30,152 sequences) were clustered using an unpublished method developed by Jason Goncalves (University of Toronto, Canada). Each cluster represents a set of unique sequences, which in many cases represents an individual gene but does not currently distinguish between alternate splice variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0130.016
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicMorphological variations and asymmetryFrench-language works237,207