MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977364702 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28366169

Metadata for the Marine Turtle Tagging and Monitoring Program by Caño Palma Biological Station

2025· dataset· en· W6977364702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPaleopathology and ancient diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataNest (protein structural motif)Turtle (robot)Nesting seasonSea turtleRainforestNesting (process)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This metadata repository describes long-term data collected by Caño Palma Biological Station and the Canadian Organization for Tropical Education and Rainforest Conservation (COTERC). The dataset spans 2006–present and is collected at Playa Norte, Costa Rica, an important Atlantic rookery. Green (<i>Chelonia mydas), </i>hawksbill <i>(Eretmochelys imbricata),</i> and leatherback turtles<i> (Dermochelys coriacea)</i> are the most common species in the database, with infrequent observations of loggerheads (<i>Caretta caretta)</i>. The data pertain to the following topics: <b>All activity: </b>Beach activity by nesting females is collected daily. When a nesting female is encountered, nest information, tag data, and body health information is collected. This data includes a tag database of all individuals observe on the study transect.<b>Nest excavations:</b> After a nest hatches or expires, information on embryo stage, predation, important incubation events, deformities, and nest success is recorded. <b>Human impact:</b> By Costa Rican law, human activity on the Playa Norte is prohibited during the sea turtle nesting season except with a permit. Data on the types, times, and locations of human activity observed during nighttime surveys is recorded.<b>Survey effort: </b>The effort expended by all field teams (i.e. morning, night, and excavation surveys) is recorded.<b>Non-standardized data:</b> This pertains to data that does not have a standardized format and does not exist for most years, and thus metadata is not included in this repository. Notably, daily nest status data contains detailed longitudinal information on events occurring throughout the incubation of each marked nest. For questions about the data or metadata, or if interested in collaborating or accessing this data, please email <i>dataintergrity@coterc.org</i>. More information about COTERC and Caño Palma Biological Station can be found at coterc.org.Peer reviewed publications using this dataset include:Damian, M., Harris, A., Aussage, J., &amp; Fraser, G. S. (2022). Seasonal deposition of marine debris on an important marine turtle nesting beach in Costa Rica. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 177, 113525.Restrepo, J., Rojas-Cañizales, D., &amp; Valverde, R. A. (2022). Historical Records of Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) Nesting at Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Journal of Herpetology, 56(3), 336-340.Pheasey, H., Glen, G., Allison, N. L., Fonseca, L. G., Chacón, D., Restrepo, J., &amp; Valverde, R. A. (2021). Quantifying illegal extraction of sea turtles in Costa Rica. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2, 705556.Pheasey, H., Roberts, D. L., Rojas-Cañizales, D., Mejías-Balsalobre, C., Griffiths, R. A., &amp; Williams-Guillen, K. (2020). Using GPS-enabled decoy turtle eggs to track illegal trade. Current Biology, 30(19), R1066-R1068.Pheasey, H., McCargar, M., Glinsky, A., &amp; Humphreys, N. (2018). Effectiveness of concealed nest protection screens against domestic predators for green (Chelonia mydas) and hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea turtles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 17(2), 263-270.Velez-Espino, A., Pheasey, H., Araújo, A., &amp; Fernández, L. M. (2018). Laying on the edge: demography of green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) nesting on Playa Norte, Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Marine Biology, 165(3), 1-12.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPaleopathology and ancient diseasesFrench-language works237,207