MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

<b>The implications of climate change for New Zealand’s freshwater fish</b>

2024· dataset· en· W6977395695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeFreshwater fishTrophic levelExtinction (optical mineralogy)TroutEffects of global warmingIntroduced speciesGlobal warming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data from:Canning, Zammit, Death. (2024). The implications of climate change for New Zealand’s freshwater fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.Abstract:Climate change is poised to reshape ecological communities globally by driving species into new environments and altering interactions between species. Conservation efforts should not only address current pressures but also plan for future pressures, such as sensitive species moving into degraded environments or arising problematic trophic interactions. This study sought to assess how climate change may affect the end-of-century distributions of New Zealand’s native and non-native freshwater fish, including consequences for the overlap between trout (a non-native sports fish) and native species vulnerable to trout predation. Random forest modelling was used to predict end-of-century distributions for New Zealand’s freshwater fish based on six hydrologically downscaled global climate models across four representative concentration pathways. Severe climate change impacts could drive nine native fish species to extinction or near-extinction and cause substantial declines in another eight native species. Seven non-natives are also predicted to decline substantially, including a 30-40% reduction in the extent of trout. To avert these potential extinctions, it is crucial to mitigate climate change severity and improve land use impacting freshwater ecosystems.Word Document: 'cjfas-2024-0127' suppla contains Supplementary material A.Excel file: 'cjfas-2024-0127supplb' contains Supplementary material Bcsv file: 'Optimal_Thresholds' contains the probability thresholds that maximised the Kappa statistic when determining presence from probability of occurrence.csv file: 'All preds RF wide' contains the probability of occurrence for all species at all river reaches modelled. Data is in wide format with columns representing individual species, along with a 'Scenario' column indicating the RCP climate, 'Model' column indicating the global circulation model used, and 'nzsegment' indicating the river reach as defined in the New Zealand River Environment Classification system v2.4.csv file: 'All preds binary RF wide' contains the presence (1) or background (0) classification for all species at all river reaches modelled. Data is in wide format with columns representing individual species, along with a 'Scenario' column indicating the RCP climate, 'Model' column indicating the global circulation model used, and 'nzsegment' indicating the river reach as defined in the New Zealand River Environment Classification system v2.4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2750.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.302
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education→French-language works237,207→