MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977395896 · doi:10.7346/se-012019-01

P.I.P.P.I. un programma che promuove l’innovazione sociale

2019· article· en· W6977395896 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePadua Research Archive (University of Padova) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
KeywordsPromotion (chess)Citizen journalismParticipatory action researchParticipatory evaluationProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article intends to propose a theoretical framework for the whole of this monograph on family vulnerability. After having generally presented the structure and functioning of the na- tional program P.I.P.P.I. and the definition of “social innovation” of the European Com- mission, the paper focuses on the description of three distinctive elements that make it possible to consider P.I.P.P.I. as a program of social innovation in Italy today: the promotion of eval- uation paths, the promotion of participatory relationships, the promotion of circularity between action, training, research and politics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePadua Research Archive (University of Padova)Same topicEducational and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207