Additional file 1 of Prenatal and childhood chlordecone exposure, cognitive abilities and problem behaviors in 7-year-old children: the TIMOUN mother–child cohort in Guadeloupe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Flow chart of the Timoun study (Neurodevelopment at seven years). Figure S2. Conceptual Directed Acyclic Graph representing the associations between chlordecone exposure, FSIQ, and potential confounders. Figure S3. Correlation plot of maternal and 7-years exposures. Table S1. Univariate associations between primary outcomes and characteristics of the study population. Table S2. Associations between cord- and 7-years blood chlordecone concentrations and cognitive and behavioral functions using SEM analyses, stratified by sex. Figure S4. Dose response relationship between cord- and 7-years blood chlordecone concentrations and WISC-IV scores. Figure S5. Dose response relationship between cord- and 7-years blood chlordecone concentrations and behavioral latent functions. Figure S6. Associations between cord-blood and 7-years chlordecone concentrations and WISC-IV composite scores obtained from the SEM path analysis with additional adjustment for co-exposures, stratified by sex. Figure S7. Associations between cord-blood and 7-years chlordecone concentrations and standardized behavioral functions obtained using SEM analyses with additional adjustment for co-exposures, stratified by sex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.653 | 0.047 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".