<i>J’étais inoubliée</i> : les moments spéciaux en danse à l’école, l’émerveillement comme expérience de transformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous étudions l’expérience scolaire des élèves dans le cadre d’un projet d’éducation artistique et culturelle (EAC) en danse autour de la problématique suivante: à quelles traces de compétences au travail donnent accès les «moments spéciaux» des élèves? Nous avons recueilli les moments d’intense émotion vécus par les élèves à travers le dispositif de recueil de données des billets «moments spéciaux». Ces verbalisations de moments spéciaux d’une classe de deuxième année de cours moyen (CM2) engagée dans un projet d’EAC nous offrent des traces des composantes de l’expérience. Discutées à l’aune de la notion de «reliance», elles permettent d’envisager l’expérience d’émerveillement parmi les transformations et montées en compétence susceptibles de s’effectuer dans le contexte des enseignements artistiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".