Community Based Tourism Activities within the Context of Sustainability of Tourism: A Case of Gelemiş Village
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing awareness about reducing negative effects of tourism activities on environment and handing down a liveable world to the next generations have enabled the rapid development of nature based tourism activities for the last 20-25 years. Although protection of environment is very essential within the context of tourism sustainability, support and active participation of locals living in the areas where the tourism activities performed is also needed for achieving desired goals in sustainability. At this point Community Based Tourism (CBT) activities aiming to create more sustainable tourism industrydraw attention through focusing on tourism development and enabling sustainability with destination communities. CBT activities play a significant role due to its particular importance on locals’ ownership at tourism activities, enabling socio-cultural and economic development and protection of environment as well. CBT activities that have rapidly increased in countries like Canada, Nepal and Malaysia is also becoming widespread in Turkey. However much more sectoral and academic studies are needed to increase its growing rate. In this study, it is aimed to search current situation of CBT activities in Gelemiş Municipality of Antalya. Within this context, 15 semi-structured interviews have been conducted with local tourism entrepreneurs and some statistics have been obtained from Gelemiş headman. Data gathered from interviews has been evaluated under six categories such as rudiments of tourism sector, active participation in CBT initiatives, investment situation, local employment and local assets usage, government incentives, awareness of local community. Results of the study, clearly show that active participation in CBT management should be enhanced and increased, also the quantity of government incentives and supports should be increased, and a master tourism plan must be prepared that considers short-medium and long term CBT development strategies."); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 29px 36px; height: 36px; width: 29px;">
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".