The relationship between night work, chronotype, and cardiometabolic risk factors in female hospital employees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Night work has emerged as a risk factor for many chronic diseases, including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. While night work is linked to a number of cardiometabolic indices, few studies have explored how different parameters, such as cumulative night work and intensity of night work, may influence cardiometabolic risk. Fewer studies have also explored the relationship while considering chronotype, a potential modifier between shift-induced circadian disruption and cardiometabolic outcomes. The main objective is to determine the association between night work parameters and cardiometabolic risk factors. The secondary objective is to assess how the association between night work parameters and cardiometabolic risk factors differs by chronotype. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 325 full- and part-time female hospital employees (168 rotating night workers, 157 day workers). Night work status, cumulative night work duration, and night work intensity were determined through self-report, and cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed through clinical exams. Chronotype was determined using the Munich Chronotype Questionniare (MCTQ). Multiple linear regression was used to examine the association between night work parameters and cardiometabolic risk factors. Current night work, cumulative night work, and night work intensity are associated with a number of cardiometabolic indices, including higher waist circumference, body mass index, fasting glucose, blood pressure, and cardiometabolic risk score. When stratified by chronotype, night work parameters are associated with a number of cardiometabolic risk factors in the evening-oriented chronotype subgroup. There is no difference in cardiometabolic risk factors in morning-oriented chronotypes when comparing night work parameters, with the exception of LDL cholesterol. These results suggest that night work parameters are associated with cardiometabolic risk, and night workers with an evening-oriented chronotype may be more susceptible to the adverse cardiometabolic impacts of night work. Future studies should consider chronotype when examining the relationship between night work and cardiometabolic risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".