Operationalization, measurement, and health indicators of sedentary behavior in individuals with cerebral palsy: a scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To explore the operationalization and measurement of sedentary behavior (SB) in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP). We searched five databases from 2011 to 2020 for primary studies of experimental, qualitative, longitudinal, or observational designs measuring SB or postures typically characterized as sedentary (sitting, reclining, lying). We screened 1112 citations and selected 47 studies. SB was operationalized through muscle activation, energy expenditure or oxygen consumption in typically sedentary postures (n = 9), and through thresholds and postures used by accelerometers, activity monitors, and a questionnaire to measure time spent in SB (n = 25). Seven out of the eight studies that measured energy expenditure found ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents of task (METs) for sitting and lying. While different accelerometer thresholds were used to measure SB, the behavior (SB) was consistently operationalized as sitting and lying. Little consistency existed in the subpopulation, instruments and cut-points for studies on validity or reliability of tools for measuring SB (n = 19). Sitting and lying are considered sedentary postures, which is defined as ≤1.5 METs in individuals with CP. There is variability in the tools used to measure SB in individuals with CP. Therefore, consensus on the definition and reporting of SB is needed.Implications for rehabilitationAlthough sedentary behavior (SB) is increased in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) compared to the typically developing population, there is no standard definition for SB for these individuals; this makes it difficult to synthesize data across studies.Sitting and lying are ≤1.5 METs in individuals with CP, suggesting we only need to measure posture to show change in SB.The commonly used accelerometer cut-point in the typically developing population of ≤100 counts per minute generally has excellent reliability across multiple devices in ambulatory children with CP. Although sedentary behavior (SB) is increased in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) compared to the typically developing population, there is no standard definition for SB for these individuals; this makes it difficult to synthesize data across studies. Sitting and lying are ≤1.5 METs in individuals with CP, suggesting we only need to measure posture to show change in SB. The commonly used accelerometer cut-point in the typically developing population of ≤100 counts per minute generally has excellent reliability across multiple devices in ambulatory children with CP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.096 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.025 | 0.028 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".