The association between antiretroviral therapy and early placental function: a cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association of antiretroviral therapy (ART) type and duration of exposure with early placental function using biomarkers of aneuploidy screening. Study design: Three hundred thirty-eight pregnant women living with HIV were enrolled in two Canadian centers. Multiple linear regressions were performed adjusting for confounding factors (race, age, gestational age, body mass index, parity, smoking, and fetal sex). Results: Women receiving ART had significantly increased second trimester alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (β = 0.147, 95% CI = [0.067–0.227] for protease inhibitor-based ART and β = 0.176, 95% CI = [0.080–0.272] for ART without protease inhibitor) compared to women who received no treatment. However, there was no significant association between ART type and the levels of free β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG), pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (first trimester), unconjugated estriol, total hCG, and inhibin A (second trimester). No significant association was shown between biomarker levels and duration of ART exposure. Conclusion: Early placental function does not appear to be significantly affected by ART, except for AFP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".