Additional file 2 of Systematic review: preoperative psychological factors and total hip arthroplasty outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 2. Summary of characteristics of included studies. Abbreviations: WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index; Pain, pain subscale; PF, physical functioning subscale; SF-36 PCS, Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Score; HHS, Harris Hip Score; HOOS, Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; PROMIS-10, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10; BPI, Brief Pain Index; BPI-SF, Brief Pain Index - Short Form; OHS, Oxford Hip Score; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression; STAI, Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory; RS-11, Resilience Scale; BRS, Brief Resilience Scale; FPI-R, Freiburg Personality Inventory - Revised; GSES, General Self-Efficacy Scale; EQ-5D, EuroQol Five-Dimension Index; SF-36 MHS, Short-Form Health Survey Mental Health Score; BSI, Brief Symptom Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire; CSQ-RF, Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised Form; SFQ, Surgical Fear Questionnaire; LOT-R, Life Orientation Test-Revised; SOMS-2, Screening of Somatoform Disorders; PBQ, Pain Belief Questionnaire; POMS, Profile of Mood States; TCI-R, Temperament and Character Inventory - Revised; MMPI, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; SF-36 MCS, Short-Form Health Survey Mental Component Score. * indicates missing or incomplete follow-up data
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.995 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".