MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electronic Supplementary Information for the manuscript entitled "<b>Ahead by a Century:</b><b> </b><b>Discovery of Laves Phases Assisted by Machine Learning</b><b>".</b>

2023· article· en· W6977708827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaves phaseInformation systemReal world data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The files contain the inputs, outputs, and the the Jupyter notebooks used for the manuscript details given below.<b>Ahead by a Century:</b><b> </b><b>Discovery of Laves Phases Assisted by Machine Learning</b><br>Ritobroto Sikdar <sup>a</sup>, Nilanjan Roy <sup>b</sup>, Balaranjan Selvaratnam <sup>a</sup>, Vidyanshu Mishra <sup>a</sup>, Amit Mondal <sup>b</sup>, Krishnendu Buxi <sup>b</sup>, Partha Pratim Jana <sup>b,</sup>*, Arthur Mar <sup>a,</sup><b>*</b><br><sup><em>a</em></sup><i> </i><i>Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2G2, Canada</i><sup><em>b</em></sup><i> </i><i>Department of Chemistry, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India</i><br>Corresponding authors.* E-mail: ppj@chem.iitkgp.ac.in (P. P. Jana).* E-mail: amar@ualberta.ca (A. Mar).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207