MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977731451 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5887319

Great Lakes Marathon Swimmers Oral History

2022· other· en· W6977731451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen waterOral historyWater bodyFace (sociological concept)Life history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Lakes have undoubtedly changed in the past century. Since these changes have impacted those who regularly interact with the lake, I would like to study the changes from their perspective. Great Lakes marathon swimmers have an intimate relationship with the Great Lakes. Open water marathon swimming involves a single swimmer with a swimsuit, goggles, and a swim cap swimming across an open body of water further than 10 kilometers. Those who have been participating in the sport for a long time have firsthand knowledge of how the lake has changed. This collection will focus on prominent Great Lakes marathon swimmers who had their swims sanctioned by Solo Swims of Ontario. Their stories will inform us about the challenges swimmers face in the Great Lakes from pollution to unpredictable weather. The ultimate goal of this project is to utilize first-hand accounts to learn about the environmental history of the Great Lakes and guide future environmental policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9870.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it