Using knowledge translation to support the integration of laboratory testing for antimicrobial stewardship in Canadian feedlots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increased burden of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans and animals, antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in the environment, and the potential for their transmission between humans and animals have increased pressure for food animal livestock production to demonstrate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a complex multifactorial disease causing high morbidity and mortality of calves in feedlot production, with antimicrobials playing an important role in management. The use of antimicrobial agents in animal agriculture has been linked to the emergence of AMR in bacterial populations, including those that can infect both animals and humans. To mitigate AMR-associated risk, AMS strategies include development and implementation of diagnostic testing to inform AMU. Laboratory tests have provided life-saving information to detect, characterize, and inform management and treatment decisions for bacterial infections in human and animal health. However, several factors have limited their application in livestock production. My thesis is part of a larger project – Genomic ASSETS (Antimicrobial Stewardships Systems for Evidence-based Treatment Strategies) for Livestock. My research objectives were to 1) synthesize available knowledge in peer-reviewed literature and relevant grey literature for the direct sample application of long-read metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of bacterial respiratory infections and related antimicrobial resistance genes and to compare long-read, sequencing methods to other molecular diagnostic techniques for nucleic acid detection; 2) identify factors that influence respiratory sample collection from live animals for laboratory testing to inform AMS for BRD management in Canadian feedlot cattle; and 3) explain how the Need-to-Knowledge (NtK) model discovery stages can be applied to designing and using a novel laboratory testing strategy as part of BRD management in western Canadian feedlots. A scoping review resulted in the synthesis of 100 peer-reviewed studies on the direct application of long-read metagenomic sequencing to detect bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in respiratory samples compared to other molecular based laboratory tools. Our review reveals a knowledge gap in research for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory pathogens and ARGs in animals using long-read metagenomic sequencing. However, there is an opportunity to harness new developments to detect multiple pathogens and ARGs on a single sequencing run. Feedlot veterinarians were interviewed to identify factors that influence live animal respiratory sample collection and laboratory testing as part of BRD management in Canadian feedlots. Eight veterinarians were interviewed from Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario, representing practices responsible for about 90% of fed-calf in Canada. This study identified the interconnections between the scientific and ethical lenses by which Canadian feedlot veterinarians view the possible integration of laboratory testing for BRD. Participants were interested in laboratory testing strategies that provide demonstrated animal health and economic benefits for their feedlot clients. They highlighted extensive experience with live animal testing for BRD research and surveillance, but acknowledge that it is not part of current BRD management. Organizational factors such as capacity, coordination, and communication are crucial when considering how a laboratory test could effectively integrate into Canadian feedlots as a support for management of BRD. The complexity of the successful development and sustainable use of new technology as an AMS strategy requires effective and appropriate knowledge translation. The NtK framework integrates three sets of best practices in scientific research, engineering development, and industrial production of technological innovations. The NtK model discovery stage was applied post hoc to the knowledge synthesis phase of Genomic ASSETS to describe knowledge translation in a complex project aimed at developing and implementing a new technology. This project demonstrated how a structured methodology can align research outputs with industry needs to promote uptake of practical solutions in livestock production. This thesis examined both the opportunities and gaps in developing laboratory technologies as part of AMS strategies, and the factors influencing the adoption of these technologies as part of BRD management in Canadian feedlots. These insights and recommendations are applicable not only in Canada but also in global efforts to reduce AMR in food animal production. This work emphasizes the essential role of multi-sectoral communication, collaboration, coordination, and capacity building to support laboratory testing as part of AMS strategies in feedlots. It provides a foundation to promote the successful design, adoption, and implementation of laboratory testing, such as metagenomic technologies in feedlot settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".