MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977930463 · doi:10.7907/gqnk-gq14

Continental glaciation in the Glenlyon area, Pelly River District, Yukon, Canada

2010· article· en· W6977930463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCaltechTHESIS (California Institute of Technology) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTubulopathyFusible alloyHyporeflexiaLiquationTSG101Diafiltration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Glenlyon area in central Yukon is bounded by 62° and 63°N and 134° and 136°W. It is part of the Yukon Plateau, a mature upland surface surmounted by isolated peaks and small ranges, and dissected by deep, young valleys. Features of glacial erosion and deposition ore such that the direction of flow and the upper limit or the last glaciation can be determined from them. Ice flowed into central Yukon from three sources, Selwyn Mountains to the east, Cassiar mountains to the southeast, and the Coast and St. Elias mountains to the south. Ice moved into the Glenlyon area from the first two of these sources and apparently the maximum stages of these two gla cial advances were not synchronous, but Selwyn ice was active last. In this area, many higher mountains and hills projected above the ice surface as nunataks. In detail, topography altered the direction of ice flow, ice thickness and extent. Evidence from adjacent parts of Yukon suggest two or possibly three glaciations but only the last has been recognized in the Glenlyon area although this could not have escaped glaciation in earlier stages. The large glaciers of central Yukon developed by windward building in contrast with the Cordilleren ice sheet in central British Columbia which developed on the lee of the Coast Range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCaltechTHESIS (California Institute of Technology)Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207