MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977967686 · doi:10.7939/r3-t0gd-3567

Polar Bear Conservation in a Period of Arctic Warming

2023· dissertation· en· W6977967686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArts, Culture, and Music Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrsus maritimusSea iceArctic sea ice declineArcticArchipelagoArctic ice packPopulationGlobal warmingClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polar bear conservation faces significant challenges under Arctic warming, especially with respect to habitat loss and the resulting impacts on their seasonal energetic uptake and maintenance. Polar bears rely on sea ice for hunting, mating, denning, and rearing of offspring, and the availability of ice, both spatially and temporally, influences their fitness and survival. The research collected in this thesis includes an assessment of the global polar bear population, identifying gaps in the knowledge, and presenting a model linking polar bear density to prey diversity, providing estimates for missing subpopulations. The majority of subpopulations are found to be vulnerable to continued Arctic warming based on decadal-scale changes to sea ice and population size. A sea ice projection model for the Canadian Arctic Archipelago provided the means to estimate how sea ice degradation and loss may affect polar bears through the 21st century. Projections suggest that, without curbing greenhouse gas emissions, ice conditions in the Archipelago will shift away from a multi-year sea ice regime, and lengthening ice-free conditions will harm polar bear reproductive success and increase starvation rates. An analysis of movement patterns of adult and subadult, males and female polar bears, in the southern Beaufort Sea suggests that the ice-free season is associated with higher movement rates, thus greater demands on energy stores during a season that is expected to get longer with future warming. An assessment of time and space use of harvest risk areas derived from historical harvest locations found that subadult males were more often in risk areas than other age and sex classes, although they avoided the highest risk areas. Landfast ice in the low-risk areas was decreasing faster over time, with the possibility to concentrate polar bears into areas of higher risk to harvest under continued Arctic warming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it