MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6978252858 · doi:10.7939/r3-g7nw-e366

Interprofessional Collaboration: An Interpretive Descriptive Study into the Experiences of Entry Level Nurses

2022· dissertation· en· W6978252858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaThematic analysisHealth careDescriptive researchQualitative researchSet (abstract data type)Descriptive statisticsReflexivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Nova Scotia (NS), within their first year of professional practice newly graduated registered nurses are considered Entry Level Nurses (ELN) (NSCN, 2013, 2020). Until now, little was known about how ELNs experience interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in interprofessional (IP) teams in Nova Scotia. This Interpretive Descriptive (ID) study sought to advance nursing knowledge and greater understanding of ELN experiences. The overarching research question guiding this study was: what are the experiences of ELNs in relation to IPC in IP teams in Nova Scotia? Subsumed under this overarching question was a set of subsidiary questions that reflected the inquiry and analysis required to develop a more comprehensive understanding of IPC across ELN and aggregate perspectives. Fifteen participants were interviewed and thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) was conducted. Four main themes surfaced from the interview data. They are described as: (1) emotions linked to IPC, (2) team characteristics, (3) development of IPC competency, and (4) contextual influences on IPC. Several sub-themes were noticed and are discussed in this paper. As Nova Scotia continues to overcome the COVID 19 pandemic, the experiences shared by the participants highlight the importance of further discovery and research. More studies are needed to explore the extent to which these themes are prevalent in healthcare teams. Today’s healthcare milieu of multiple care providers and complex treatment regimens demand the active participation from nurses and all members of the interprofessional (IP) team including the patient and family (Accreditation Canada, 2019). Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is an essential component in the delivery of nursing care. The State of the World’s Nursing 2020 report (WHO, 2020) proclaims the healthcare system needs RNs working to the full extent of their education and the maximization of their roles within IP teams (WHO, 2020). Similarly, the Nova Scotia College of Nursing (NSCN, 2020) defines the RN as a collaborator required for optimal IPC. New trends and issues are documented in nursing (ICN, 2020; WHO, 2020). The World Health Organization (2020) suggests that newly graduated registered nurses play a key role in resolving nurse burnout, current workload issues, and recruitment and retention challenges. The COVID 19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need to address these issues in nursing, especially from the viewpoint of ELNs in unpredictable team circumstances while attempting to achieve IPC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207