Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diagnostic Ophthalmology Ophtalmologie diagnostiqueHistory and clinical signs A 6-year-old chocolate point Himalayan cat was examined by the ophthalmology service at the Western College of Veterinary Medicine (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan).This cat was presented with a discolored spot on the left cornea, squinting, and tearing.The menace responses and palpebral, oculocephalic, direct, and consensual pupillary light reflexes were normal bilaterally.Schirmer tear test (Schirmer Tear Test Strips; Alcon Canada, Mississauga, Ontario) values were 10 and 19 mm/min in the right and left eyes, respectively.Intraocular pressures were estimated with a rebound tonometer (Tonovet; Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) and were 19 and 20 mmHg in the right and left eyes respectively.Fluorescein staining (Fluorets; Bausch & Lomb Canada, Markham, Ontario) of the corneas was negative in the right eye and positive in the left eye.Examination of both eyes using a transilluminator (Welch Allyn Finoff Transilluminator; Welch Allyn, Mississauga, Ontario) and handheld biomicroscope (Kowa SL-17 Portable Slit Lamp; Kowa, Tokyo, Japan) revealed mild medial ventral entropion.The left eye had blepharospasm, epiphora, and superficial corneal vascularization from 12 to 3 o'clock, extending toward a poorly demarcated, brown lesion within the axial cornea.A photograph of the left eye at presentation is provided for your assessment (Figure 1).Following application of 0.5% tropicamide (Mydriacyl; Alcon Canada), examination of both eyes using a transilluminator (Welch Allyn Finoff Transilluminator; Welch Allyn) and handheld biomicroscope (Kowa SL-17 Portable Slit Lamp; Kowa) revealed no other abnormalities.Indirect ophthalmoscopic (Heine Omega 500; Heine Instruments Canada, Kitchener, Ontario) examination was within normal limits in both eyes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.136 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".