Actitudes Políticas Opuestas y Análisis Transaccional en Universitarios de Lima
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se comparó y relacionó las actitudes políticas opuestas de conservadurismo y radicalismo, así como las Conductas parentales negativas (Análisis Transaccional AT) en una muestra no probabilística de 414 estudiantes universitarios varones y mujeres de las carreras de psicología, ingeniería, ciencias económicas y derecho de una universidad estatal y otra particular de la ciudad de Lima, Perú. Se usó como instrumentos el Cuestionario del CPRI (Canadian Peace Research Institute) y el Cuestionario de Conductas Parentales Negativas de Roberto Kertesz. Todos los universitarios resultaron conservadores en actitudes políticas. Aplicando el estadístico U de Mann Whitney sólo se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el nivel de conservadurismo-radicalismo de los estudiantes de psicología e ingeniería, así como entre los estudiantes de psicología y ciencias económicas, siendo en ambos casos menos conservadores los estudiantes de psicología. Usando la r de Spearman no se encontró relación estadísticamente significativa entre las actitudes políticas opuestas de conservadurismo-radicalismo y las Conductas parentales negativas AT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".