Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this dissertation, we consider the problem of piecewise polynomial approximation of functions over sets of triangulations. Recently developed adaptive methods, where the hierarchy of triangulations is not fixed in advance and depends on the local properties of the function, have received considerable attention. The quick development of these adaptive methods has been due to the discovery of the wavelet transform in the 1960's, probably the best tool for image coding. Since the mid 80's, there have been many attempts to design `Second Generation' adaptive techniques that particularly take into account the geometry of edge singularities of an image. But it turned out that almost none of the proposed `Second Generation' approaches are competitive with wavelet coding. Nevertheless, there are instances that show deficiencies in the wavelet algorithms. The method suggested in this dissertation incorporates the geometric properties of convex sets in the construction of adaptive triangulations of an image. The proposed algorithm provides a nearly optimal order of approximation for cartoon images of convex sets, and is based on the idea that the location of the centroid of certain types of domains provides a sufficient amount of information to construct a 'good' approximation of the boundaries of those domains. Along with the theoretical analysis of the algorithm, a Matlab code has been developed and implemented on some simple cartoon images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".