Additions to the Revised Catalog of Ohio Vascular Plants. III.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Ohio State Herbarium, at present, contains over 40,000 sheets of vascular plants and in addition to these, collections of considerable size of bryophytes, algae and fungi.During the past year a large .amount of material has been received, so large in fact that it has not yet been possible to study it all carefully.Because of financial assistance furnished by the government through F.E.R.A., four students have been at work, for the allotted time, during three terms, cleaning and anchoring the old specimens and poisoning and mounting the new additions and one extra student has been at work during the spring quarter writing labels for the new specimens, which in itself requires a large amount of time.The herbarium will thus be in much better condition than it has been for a long time.Complete lists of the species of plants of the Eastern United States, based on the Cambridge International Rules of Nomenclature, are still not available.It is thus considered advisable to continue to use mainly the American Rules until it is possible to make a complete revision, at least of the vascular plants.Only the rarest and most important species are listed below.Among these are 22 species entirely new to the state catalog.There are also 12 additional Ohio records which have been taken from A. S. Hitchcock's new Manual of the Grasses of the United States and it is hoped that specimens of these will be found from time to time by our enthusiastic collectors.One species has been dropped from the list.The Catalog of Ohio Vascular Plants thus contains 33 more species than at the last report of additions.During the past year the Department of Botany received a small bequest from Hannah J. Biddlecome, who died in 1934.Miss Biddlecome was one of the earliest amateur botanists of Ohio and in her later years took a special interest in the development of the State Herbarium, presenting her especially fine collections of mosses, liverworts, and ferns, which make a valuable addition to the representation of these groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".