Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agents of Deterioration is a group Exhibition held at the Lethaby Gallery London, 10th -12th January 2024 as part of the Sideshow exhibition programme in the Gallery. The exhibtion explored and challenged the constraining legacies of museum practices and was an outcome of The Prisoner's of Love Research project which set up conversations with museums and institutions in London, Mumbai in India, Oxford, Accra in Ghana, Hastings and Alberta, Canada. Participating Artists included: Esi Eshun, Dawn Codex, Charles Nyiha, Ian Dawson, The Compound 13 Lab, Deserae Tailfeathers, Adanma Nwankwo, Darby Herman, Louisa Minkin, Serene Weasel Traveller, Thomas Allison, Mame Afua Mensah, Helen Robertson, Joseph Ijoyemi, Rabiya Nagi, Rayya Khuri, Migueltzinta Solis, Walker English, Kylie Fineday, Raine Crandall, Rihanata Bigey, Fungai Marima. With works from the CSM Archive & Study Collection by John James Audubon, Cornelia Parker, Mark Wallinger, Yinka Shonibare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".