MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6979783933

Agricultural wood as an ecological focus area: conventional german farmer's attitudes

2019· other· en· W6979783933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Lisbon Repository (University of Lisbon) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
KeywordsAgricultureGermanArable landWood industryQuarter (Canadian coin)Common Agricultural PolicyOrder (exchange)Agricultural policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cultivating agricultural wood is an option to comply with the greening-restrictions of the current Common Agricultural Policy.Agricultural wood is a bioenergy source well accepted by wider society.It is classified as ecologically important by various European studies and its growing could answer some of the public criticism directed towards industrialised agriculture.However, agricultural wood is only of minor relevance in most European countries.In order to identify survey was conducted among farmers in Germany in the first quarter of 2017.The results indicate that farms with less favourable local conditions and arable farms as well as risk-averse farmers are more promising target groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Lisbon Repository (University of Lisbon)Same topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207