Alternativa: O "común-ismo republicano" o tanatopolítica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Encabezado con el rótulo "Alternativa: O "común-ismo republicano" o tanatopolítica", este capítulo de la obra colectiva titulada "Covidosofía" recoge mi aportación al conjunto de escritos en ella reunidos en los que, desde la filosofía, se pensó la realidad de la pandemia de covid-19, su impacto en nuestras sociedades, los modos de afrontarla y las perspectivas de futuro que a partir de ahí se abrían. En este texto el acento recae sobre lo que exige una "política de vida" desde lo "común", al modo en que lo plantean C. Laval y P. Dardot, tal como debe potenciarlo una biopolítica democrática, tal cual la piensa Roberto Esposito, radicalizada en términos republicanos de manera que efectivamente pueda enfrentarse a modos de actuar que pueden reunirse bajo la denominación de "tanatopolítica" o "política de muerte".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".