MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6979842247

Alternative Housing Solutions

2022· other· en· W6979842247 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffordable housingPublic housingIncentiveContext (archaeology)PopulationQuality (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For more than a decade, serious public concern has been growing over the cost of housing and the shortage of affordable options geared to low- and moderate-income households globally. Research has shown that a large and increasing share of the population cannot afford its housing costs. In Canada, the gap has increased between the number of households that need supportive housing geared to income and the number of these units the current housing system can deliver. Increasing demand for this type of housing has put incredible pressure on cities and social housing providers to try and meet demand. Cities have been depending on market-developers to provide affordable options through varied incentive programs, but uptake has been slow due to their lower profitability. Within the global context of unaffordability, we are seeing a re-emergence of alternative models of provision and ownership being piloted by cities and community groups around the world. These alternatives are largely based on principles of co-production and community ownership that recognize that housing can be both a strong driver of productive economic development as well as a means to improving social well-being and the quality of life for all. Such models include co-operatives and community land trusts. While these models are still seen as alternatives to mainstream supply, public and social housing operators have proven their viability and potential in helping fill the affordable housing gap.
\n
\nThrough a combination of research methods taken from the fields of design thinking, foresight, and systems thinking, this Major Research Project explores alternative housing models in Canada and abroad. A focus is made on building institutional resilience, by looking at emerging patterns of increased self-reliance, entrepreneurial strategies, and partnerships for the provision of new social housing. Additionally, this project considers new paradigms being explored in the housing and city-building space which acknowledge the complexity of varied perspectives in cities, as well as the climate-related emergencies and other factors that impact the housing ecosystem. Finally, this project proposes a conceptual co-production model of housing provision by leveraging public land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0080.007
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)French-language works237,207