MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6979866469

AMS sustainable food truck : technology assessment & energy management

2015· article· en· W6979866469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolar Energy Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckEconomic shortageEnergy managementEnergy (signal processing)Battery (electricity)Point (geometry)Management systemSustainable energyEnergy management system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AMS at UBC has a goal to drastically reduce the Green House Gas
\nemission in the next decade. For such manner, a sustainable food truck fits their
\npurpose and the culture of the city of Vancouver. This project involves a simulation
\nsystem as well as an energy management algorithm to predict the behaviour of the
\nelectrical system of the truck and to best suit its needs, considering all the
\nequipment is powered by solar panels (as a primary source), fuel cells (secondary
\nsource) and a battery (back-up source). Also, the project includes the
\nimplementation of each subsystem and their integration to the point where the
\nrelevant data can be displayed on the screen. The user will be able to customize
\nthe simulations, choosing which subsystem will be turned on or off.
\nScenarios for the simulations were tested, such as a busy sunny day
\n(during summer), providing enough data to state that the mobility system of the
\ntruck may not be supported by the sources. Moreover, unless the technologies for
\nequipment and energy generation are well chosen, energy shortage might be
\nexpected in bad-case scenarios, such as a cloudy day.
\nThe results of these simulations will be used to create and design
\nspecifications of the truck's energy systems in future stages of the AMS
\nSustainable Food Truck project. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicSolar Energy Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207