Análisis comparativo de los procesos metodológicos que se aplican en la enseñanza aprendizaje del idioma Kichwa desde primero hasta cuarto de educación general básica durante el segundo trimestre en las escuelas interculturales bilingües: “provincia de Loja y Manuel J . Calle”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a country like Ecuador, it is important to consider cultural diversity, where each \nnation and nationality has its own language, lifestyle and ancestral wisdom, developed \nby their ancestors. This document is part Analyze and compare the methodological \nprocesses that apply in the learning Kichwa language from first to fourth year of general \nbasic education during the second quarter in Intercultural Bilingual Schools: Province of \nLoja, Manuel J. Calle in order to strengthen the language. This is achieved through a \nbrief description of the aspects of intercultural bilingual education, methods used in \nlanguage learning, and also talks about the Kichwa as their first language and second \nlanguage, to guarantee the right to education of indigenous peoples highlight was \nconsidered the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador 2008 and the Organic Law of \nIntercultural Education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".