MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6979931297

Annexes de l'étude : Une ligne de conduite pour corriger la problématique des taux marginaux implicites de taxation

2008· other· fr· W6979931297 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal) · 2008
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101LiquationDysgeusiaDiafiltrationFusible alloyDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le cadre des travaux de recherche de la Chaire, Luc Godbout et Suzie St-Cerny ont publié une étude intitulée « Impôts sur le revenu : une ligne de conduite pour corriger la problématique des taux marginaux implicites de taxation » dans la Revue de planification fiscale et successorale de l'Association de planification fiscale et financière (APFF), 2006 : vol. 27, no 2, p. 327-360. Pour un complément d'information au sujet notamment des calculs effectués dans cette étude, vous pouvez consulter le document annexe ici-même.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)Same topicRetinal and Macular SurgeryFrench-language works237,207