MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6979964105

ANTI-SAP CHEMICALS AND HOT WATER QUARANTINE TREATMENT EFFECTS ON STORAGE LIFE AND FRUIT QUALITY OF MANGO CV. SAMAR BAHISHT CHAUNSA

2012· article· en· W6979964105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMassey Research Online (Massey University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchAlberta Agricultural Research Institute
KeywordsTitratable acidLimePulp (tooth)BrowningAscorbic acidOrganolepticPostharvestQuarantine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed at testing the combined effects of anti-sap chemicals and hot water quarantine treatment (HWQT: 48C-60min) on a commercial mango cv.Samar Bahisht (S.B.) Chaunsa, as potential protocol for export to China.The physiologically mature mango fruit were harvested along with 4-5 cm pedicel.After de-stemming, the fruits were treated with potential anti-sap chemicals: calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH) 2 ], potassium aluminium sulphate [KAl(SO 4 ) 2 .12(H 2 O)], Tween-80 [C 64 H 124 O 26 ].After chemical application, half of the fruit lot was subjected to HWQT as per protocol, while the remaining half was kept without HWQT.The fruit after treatments were air dried, packed in cardboard boxes and stored (131C, 85% RH) for 21 days.Sapburn injuries were scored after 24, 48, 72 hrs and 21days of storage.After storage the fruit were allowed to ripe at room temperature and assessed for physical disorders and disease incidence.Fruit were also analysed for firmness, peel colour, sugars, titratable acidity, total carotenoids, ascorbic acid contents and organoleptic characteristics (pulp colour, texture, taste, aroma, flavour).Sapburn injury score showed significant differences for chemicals and chemical-HWQT interactions.De-stemming under lime [Ca (OH) 2 ] followed by HWQT showed least sapburn injury with more firm fruit.HW treated fruit showed significantly lower anthracnose disease incidence (1.68 vs 2.42), while higher sugars (18.32 vs 14.56%) with more pulp browning (0.74 vs 0.48) and higher total carotenoids (67.0 vs 56.1g/g) compared to without HWQT.Organoleptic evaluation revealed smoother pulp texture in fruit without HWQT.It was concluded that mango desapping with 1.0% lime solution, followed by HWQT (48C-60min), did not significantly impair quality during 21 days of storage, beside controlling sapburn injury and meeting market access requirement.However, in view of the exhibited heat induced effects, more studies are needed on HWQT effects on various maturity levels and improving post-storage colour development in mango cv.S.B. Chaunsa, for its export to China, by sea or road, using refrigerated containers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it