Antonio JIMÉNEZ ORTIZ, Por los caminos de la increencia. La fe en diálogo, CCS («Estudios teológicos», 3), Madrid 1993, 174 pp., 17 x 24. [RECENSIÓN]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SCRIPTA THEOLOGICA 26 (1994/2) continuidad, etc.), se presentan como consecuencias de ese análisis.Resulta alentador que la cuestión de la tradición vaya adquiriendo un lugar significativo en la teología protestante, aunque será necesario que e! interés por la tradición misma y sus constituyentes lingüísticos, históricos, sociológicos etc, en los que se incide -este es e! caso palmario de! libro de Schori-permitan dar pronto e! paso a la cuestión estrictamente teológica que viene formulada por la relación de la tradición con Cristo y con la Iglesia.La bibliografía que aporta Schori, en la que son minoría las obras directamente teológicas, es una muestra de que la dirección tomada es todavía aproximativa.C. Izquierdo Antonio ]IMÉNEZ ORTIZ, Por los cami• nos de la increencia.La fe en diálogo, ces «
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".