MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980014512

Aramex sells 4.5 percent stake to Australia postal service

2016· other· en· W6980014512 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostal serviceService (business)Post officeFinancial servicesCustomer serviceQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dubai-based Aramex has sold 4.5 percent of it's courier company to Australia's postal service. The financial terms of the sale weren't released. The Dubai-based courier Aramex says Australia's postal service has bought a 4 and half percent stake in the company.Aramex confirmed the purchase by Australia Post in a disclosure to the Dubai Financial Market on Tuesday. It didn't provide financial terms.Last month, Aramex sold a nearly 10-percent stake in the Dubai-based company to a Cayman Islands-based company, Boson Ventures Corporation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0090.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicLegal Cases and CommentaryFrench-language works237,207