¡Así encendimos la mecha!. Treinta años del levantamiento indígena en Ecuador: una historia permanente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este 2020 se cumplen treinta años del primer levantamiento indígena ocurrido en junio de 1990. Su conmemoración está signada por otro levantamiento, el noveno, ocurrido en octubre de 2019. Una de las ideas extendidas hasta antes de octubre, era que el movimiento indígena atravesaba una crisis estructural de largo alcance. Luego de octubre se volvió a ubicar al movimiento indígena en el centro de la lucha político-social del país. Floresmilo Simbaña, Nina Pacari, Inti Cartuche, Ampam Karakras, Inés Zambrano, Luz María Romero, Adriana Rodríguez, Dolores Figueroa, Marco León, Ileana Almeida (en entrevista con Philipp Altmann), Ruth Moya (en entrevista con Luis Herrera y Adriana Rodríguez) y Marc Becker, analizan el proceso, memoria y avances del movimiento indígena. Retoman y discuten el proceso histórico del sujeto político que ha influido de manera significativa en los últimos treinta años de la vida del Ecuador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".