MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980141341

From Bad to Worse: Assessing the Long-Term Consequences of Four Controversial FCC Decisios

2012· article· en· W6980141341 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrooklyn law review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCable modemDuopolyScarcityBroadbandThe InternetOrder (exchange)Quarter (Canadian coin)Competition (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A duopoly controls the broadband Internet access marketplace in the United States.Cable and DSL providers currently control almost 98 percent of the residential and small-business broadband market.More than one quarter of consumers have only one choice between cable and DSL, and even in markets with both services available, customers usually face a duopoly, with one choice for each type of service.Under any economic standard "nearly every regional broadband market is very highly concentrated."The problem this situation generates is really very simple to grasp: in order to "reach" the logical and content layers, one has to "pass through" the physical layer; whoever controls the physical layer, unless restricted by law, becomes a gatekeeper for all other layers; and scarcity of physical layers means more control, and ability to realize that control, for fewer gatekeepers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrooklyn law reviewSame topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207