MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980141341

From Bad to Worse: Assessing the Long-Term Consequences of Four Controversial FCC Decisios

2012· article· en· W6980141341 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrooklyn law review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCable modemDuopolyScarcityBroadbandThe InternetOrder (exchange)Quarter (Canadian coin)Competition (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economies of scope exist when one firm can produce two or more products at a lower total cost than if each product were produced separately by different firms.Scope economies can be a barrier to entry if entrants are unable to produce and sell all of the products the incumbent produces, and the resulting higher cost makes it unprofitable to enter the market.Id. at 17,029, n.246.9 The FCC has determined that various broadband technologies for accessing the Internet all qualify for limited regulatory oversight.See, e.g., In re Inquiry Concerning High-Speed Access to the Internet over Cable and their Facilities, 17 FCC Rcd.4798, 4802 (Mar.15, 2002) (declaratory ruling and notice of proposed rulemaking), aff'd, Nat'l Cable & Telecomms.Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967 (2005); Wireline Broadband Classification Order, supra note 3, at 14,855.10An information service is defined as the offering of a capability for generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing, retrieving, utilizing, or making available information via telecommunications, and includes electronic publishing, but does not include any use of any such capability for the management, control, or operation of a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrooklyn law reviewSame topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207