Bastaba esta general insinuación de la utilidad, que saca la Medicina de los Insectos, para apreciarlos [...]: um estudo das virtudes terapêuticas de insetos na obra Paraguay Natural, do padre jesuíta José Sanchez Labrador.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo, apresento os resultados da pesquisa que venho desenvolvendo, desde julho de 2014, inserida no projeto Uma ordem de homens de religião e de ciência, que tem entre seus objetivos a análise de obras produzidas por missionários jesuítas que atuaram também como homens de ciência. Dentre eles, destaca-se o padre José Sanchez Labrador, autor da obra Paraguay Natural Ilustrado, na qual o missionário descreve a geografia, a fauna e a flora das regiões da Província Jesuítica do Paraguai em que atuou. Para o desenvolvimento da pesquisa, utilizei uma cópia digitalizada do manuscrito da obra – ainda inédita –, que se encontra no Arquivo Romano da Sociedade de Jesus (ARSI), em Roma. A obra foi escrita entre 1771 e 1776 e se divide em quatro partes, sendo que me deterei na análise da quarta parte da obra, em que Sanchez Labrador descreve o emprego terapêutico de insetos, ressaltando suas virtudes e modos de preparo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".