MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6980233631

Bio-Based Production of Uroporphyrin and Protoporphyrin-IX in Escherichia coli

2023· dissertation· en· W6980233631 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscherichia coliBioprocessPlasmidMetabolic engineeringBioreactorSynthetic biologyTetrapyrroleStrain (injury)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porphyrins are tetrapyrrole compounds with diverse medical applications but challenging chemical and biological synthesis. This thesis reports a novel bioprocess approach for enhanced production of porphyrins including uroporphyrin (UP) and protoporphyrin IX (PP-IX) in Escherichia coli (E. coli) through the implementation of the C4/Shemin pathway. We first heterologously implemented the C4/Shemin pathway in an E. coli strain with an enlarged intracellular succinyl-CoA pool. Using plasmids with trc and gracmax promoters regulating the expression of synthesized gene operons, we characterized the effects of key pathway genes (hemA, hemB, hemC, hemD, hemE, and hemF, and hemG) on UP and PP-IX biosynthesis. By cultivating the resulting engineered E. coli strains in a glycerol-fed batch bioreactor under aerobic conditions, we produced up to 901.9 mg/L UP and 64.7 mg/L PP-IX. This thesis demonstrates the utility of synthetic biology and metabolic engineering strategies for large-scale bio-based production of UP and PP-IX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US→French-language works237,207→