Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the highway infrastructure of North America provides great benefits by connecting both urban and rural communities, this infrastructure also comes with significant costs by separating and creating barriers between various communities. The Sunnyside beach area in Toronto is an example of an important public area isolated by the Gardiner Expressway from the neighborhoods of Swansea, Sunnyside, Roncesvalles Village, and Parkdale. This thesis explores two prototype strategies for urban and architectural interventions on two sites in the Sunnyside area by both bridging over the Gardiner Expressway and traversing underneath it, as an approach that could be applied in other key locations along arterial urban highways. \nImplementation of these reconnection strategies would provide an opportunity to add significant new activity programs in the Sunnyside area. The programming and spatial character of former recreation activities and facilities at Sunnyside are used within a process of urban memory retrieval to organise the proposed new buildings. Within the buildings, interior boundaries - walls between rooms - are eliminated as static space dividers and replaced as expanded functional space. \nIn-between Boundaries offers a systematic perspective for analysing a range of design scales for the built environment from urban design to site and building design scales and, in so doing, proposes an enhanced degree of complexity and continuity in architectural design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it