Biohazard Legionella in health care facilities in Rome and province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Legionella is a causative agent of bacterial pneumonia, a risk factor for pneumonia for patients, but also for workers. \nObjectives: The authors describe the cases arising from the activities of prevention and control operating within the \nprovince of Rome by the Lazio Regional Environmental Protection Agency (ARPALazio). \nMethods: 4354 samples were analyzed, as follows: 27.65% in 2007, 35% in 2008 and 37.35% in 2009. The activity sampling was evenly distributed between 25% and 30% in each quarter of year. \nResults: In 2007 the non-compliant samples are 10.60%, to become 24.57% in 2008 and finally 26.63% in 2009. The level of contamination is low in 13%, 11% medium and high in 3% of the total. \nConclusions: The Legionella contamination does not present a specific distribution in the four quarters of time \nconsidered for each year or a specific distribution for the type of health facility, and the level of contamination settles on medium-low values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".