Bios: The Biology Department Newsletter - Fall 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vol. XXII, No. 1 | [Articles:] "Biology Department Adds Two New Tenure-track Faculty Members"; "New Publications by Biology Faculty and Their Students"; "Research Talks and Posters Presented at National Meetings"; "Students Present for Sigma Xi"; "Students and Faculty Receive Grants and Scholarships"; "A K??lner Summer"; "A Summer at Johns Hopkins"; "CSUN Science Popularized"; "Sequencing Facility Improved"; "Students Earn Awards"; "Correspondence to Nature"; "Biology Honors Program"; "Noyce Scholarships: Future \nTeachers Encouraged to Apply"; "Fare thee well"; "Research Opportunities"; "Biology???Ecology & Evolution Reading (BEER) Club"; "University Honors Dole with \nDistinguished Teaching Award"; "Schiffman Invited to Join \nCarrizo Review Team"; "Flor y Ciencia Published"; "Schiffman visits Mendel"; "Tropical Biology Semester, Spring Offerings and Other Classes"; "A Hydra Sabbatical"; "Ferns grow for Kanno"; "Two Biology Faculty \nHonored Taxonomically"; "Pre-health Professionals to Confer"; "Frank Hovore, Naturalist, Passes"; "Teachers Learn from SCALE"
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".