MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980278179

Book Review: Geomedical Aspects in Present and Future Research: Geomedical Aspects in Present and Future Research, Edited by LÃ¥gJul. Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Universitetsforlaget, OsloâBergenâTromsø, Norway: 226 pp., figs & tables, 22.4 à 16.2 à 1.7 cm, [no price indicated], 1980

2017· other· en· W6980278179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuereroDoc Digital Library · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorwegianField (mathematics)Biologist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

the only Fungi that make mycotoxins in hyphal stage, etc.Here is a ripe field of study remaining unploughed, waiting for the ecologist-evolutionary biologist to mine through the mountain of data and experiments accumulating about mycotoxins; it is my bet that such an endeavour will pay off handsomely for both the medical and the ecological worlds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.024
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it