Bridging the knowledge gaps to promote more environmentally sustainable buildings - It begins at the foundation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Toronto has recognized building structures as an \nintegral tool for reducing its carbon footprint. Yet \na paramount concern, however, is whether the \nbuilding and construction industry is prepared and \npositioned to effectively design and communicate \nthe importance of sustainable buildings. The decisions \nduring the pre-design stage of new building \ndevelopments are vital in affecting the project’s \noverall sustainability. The plan for transitioning \nand promoting more environmentally sustainable \nbuildings is hard to define; however, using design \nthinking, systems thinking, and strategic foresight, \nthis report has clarified a pathway by focusing on \nknowledge management. This report concludes \nby offering three areas to strengthen knowledge \nbuilding and management capabilities within the \nbuilding and construction industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".