MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6980315241

Broadscale effects of landscape on genetic structure of polar bears

2022· dissertation· en· W6980315241 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetic structureBiological dispersalArcticContext (archaeology)PopulationResistance (ecology)Environmental changePopulation genetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interplay between landscape features and genetic processes (e.g., gene flow, genetic drift) ultimately shapes population structure and species distributions. Understanding the evolutionary processes linking species and their environments can inform species’ responses to stochastic or human-induced change. Individual dispersal and connectivity among populations can be studied using the rapidly advancing field of landscape genetics through integrative study of spatial genetic patterns and their relation to landscape variables. Studying these dynamics through time is not often done, yet offers greater potential to evaluate the effects of landscapes on gene flow, and enables study of genetic change. The polar bear (Ursus martimus) is a circumpolar, apex arctic predator, considered to be in peril in the context of rapidly changing arctic environments. It is of great cultural and spiritual importance to Inuit peoples, and is hunted across the Arctic. Using over two decades (1997–2020) of polar bear harvest sample data collected by Inuit throughout Nunavut and the Inuvialuit Settlement Region, I conduct a comparison of polar bear spatial genetic structure and landscape resistance through time. I use resistance models to relate landscape variables to genetic structure for each of two periods of sampling across a consistent distribution (1997–2008 and 2009–2020). I observe local changes in spatial genetic structure across the Arctic Archipelago between periods. Resistance models emphasize the importance of both sea ice extents and landcover across this distribution for each period. Spatial autoregressive lag models indicate genetic change is predicted by sea ice resistance change between periods. I thus detect change in genetic structure resulting from environmental change, and identify sea ice as the leading underlying factor. Temporal landscape-genetic studies offer valuable insight on wide-ranging, continuously distributed species for conservation and management decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→