Brussels, Cairo, Montreal or surrealist identity in fragments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
P. Nougé et R. Magritte en Belgique, G. Henein et R. Younane en Egyste C. Gauvreau et P. -E. Borduas au Québec, appartiennent à un surréalisme périphérique. Le regard qu'ils portent sur le mouvement mais aussi sur la modernité nous couvie en effet à percevoir un surréalisme différent qui n'est pas sans affinité avec les pensées de Derrida, Deleuze, Lyotard ou Peirce. En interrogeant avec pertinence les contradictions du mouvement, leurpoint de vue sur l'histoire, la mémoine, le merveilleux, fait émerger un nouveau rapport à la figure, à l'image, à l'abstraction. Les surréalistes francophones proposent proposent une vision du monde où l'indéterminé réorganise l'histoire, ses "complexes", ses symboles, son logocentrisme. Le mythe d'Orphée éclaire toutes ces questions en redéfinissant les frontières qui séparent la mémoire de l'imagination, le réel et le surréél et en donnant au féminin une place importante qui favorise le décentrement et l'occupation d'une marge créatice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".