MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980412650

CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL OF WETLANDS IN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES

2025· article· en· W6980412650 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioactive natural compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCarbon sequestrationWetlandBiogeochemical cycleEcosystemClimate changeEcosystem servicesAtmospheric carbon cycleBiogeochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wetlands provide crucial ecosystem services, including hydrological regulation, biogeochemical functions, and biodiversity support, which enhance landscape resilience. A key biogeochemical function is carbon sequestration—the long-term storage of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) as organic carbon (OC) in wetland soils. This natural process mitigates climate change by removing CO₂ from the atmosphere. However, wetland loss, primarily due to agricultural expansion, significantly diminishes their carbon sequestration capacity and associated ecosystem benefits. Urgent and effective policies and management strategies are needed, but a limited understanding of the biogeochemical processes driving carbon sequestration hinders sustainable wetland management. This research investigates the OC sequestration potential of wetlands across Canada’s diverse climatic gradients. The OC sequestration rate of undisturbed wetlands ranged from 0.25 to 1.56 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹. Using statistical learning techniques, the study identifies key factors influencing OC sequestration rates, such as inundation probability, human impact, and soil properties. The machine learning model achieved high predictive accuracy (adjusted coefficient of determination [R²] = 0.70). This study shows that statistical learning models, informed by expert knowledge of process controls, can estimate OC sequestration rates within wetlands. Rewetted wetlands demonstrated a steady increase of total OC stock post-wetting, reaching 24.60 Mg C ha⁻¹. Net change of OC sequestration post-rewetting showed an increasing trend from baseline levels, peaking between 4–14 years post-rewetting, followed by a gradual decline to baseline levels within 40 years. These findings underscore the time-dependent nature of wetland carbon sequestration and highlight restoration by rewetting can be a viable strategy to enhance climate mitigation efforts. This study provides crucial evidence to guide the protection and restoration of wetlands as natural climate solutions (NCS). By integrating carbon sequestration data into policy frameworks and national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories, these ecosystems can contribute meaningfully to global climate targets. Moreover, the results support wetland inclusion in carbon markets and emphasize the necessity of sustainable land-use practices to ensure long-term ecosystem functionality. This work establishes a foundation for future research and policy to leverage wetlands as integral components of climate action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicBioactive natural compoundsFrench-language works237,207