MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980441264

Carnets de navigation : Géopoétique

2013· other· fr· W6980441264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2013
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101LiquationDiafiltrationDysgeusiaEmperipolesisFusible alloyDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carnets de navigation de La Traversée - Atelier québécois de géopoétique Sujet : La géopoétique constitue un champ de recherche et de création orienté vers l'exploration du rapport sensible et intelligent à la terre, à l'espace qui environne l'humain; elle tente de faire converger des observations, des réflexions, des intuitions issues de la science, de la philosophie, de la poésie et des arts (voir K. White, Le Plateau de l’Albatros, 1994, p. 27). Cette approche vise à «ouvrir un nouvel ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.006
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3320.096

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareFrench-language works237,207