Chiusi: dalla citta etrusca al municipio romano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The epigraphic production of Chiusi in the Hellenistic period is well known for its exceptional size. Studying this extraordinary corpus poses problems that are not easy to solve, especially because the history of archaeological research has led to a considerable dispersion not only of the inscriptions themselves, but also of the reports about their discovery. In the last thirty-five years, the study of archival documents has made it possible to recover much information. The possibility to put on a map the findspots of inscribed objects, has helped to understand that during the first half of the 2nd century BC there was a partial reorganization of land ownership. This was not a generalized phenomenon, because only some of the large estates, following a crisis or the extinction of the owners’ families, suffered a fragmentation, which allowed groups of families of a more modest level to acquire landed properties, where they imitated the same patterns of behavior implemented by the local aristocracies. The most discussed aspect of the history of Clusine funerary culture concerns the sudden cessation of the qualitatively higher production, that of alabaster urns, after the first quarter of the 2nd century BC, and its complete replacement with more modest series, produced in very large quantities; this was accompanied by an explosion in epigraphic production. Prosopography has shown that this phenomenon is not a consequence of the disappearance of the elite families, which, on the contrary, still appear substantially in good health throughout the 2nd and 1st centuries BC. Funerary epigraphy is an exceptional source for understanding the changes in the Clusine citizen body that followed its incorporation into the Roman state in 90 BC. It is possible to sigle out individuals of non-Etruscan origin, who, at least initially, seem to be of a relatively modest social rank; they try as much as possible to achieve integration through the establishment of marriage ties with local families. The same strategy was also followed by higher-ranking immigrant families, who arrived later, and became part of a new elite of domi nobiles in the early Imperial period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".